The editorial workflow follows several stages to ensure quality and transparency.
Stage 1: Initial Screening
The editorial office performs an initial screening to verify that:
- The manuscript fits the journal’s scope
- Formatting requirements are met
- The manuscript meets basic quality standards
Manuscripts failing to meet these criteria may be rejected at this stage.
Stage 2: Plagiarism Screening
All manuscripts undergo plagiarism screening using similarity detection software to ensure originality.
Manuscripts with significant similarity may be rejected or returned for revision.
Stage 3: Peer Review
Manuscripts passing the initial screening are sent for double-blind peer review, where at least two independent experts evaluate the research.
Reviewers assess the manuscript based on:
- Originality
- Research methodology
- Contribution to knowledge
- Clarity and organization
- Relevance to the journal’s scope
Stage 4: Editorial Decision
Based on the reviewers’ recommendations, the editor may decide:
- Accept the manuscript
- Request minor revisions
- Request major revisions
- Reject the manuscript
Authors receiving revision requests must submit a revised manuscript along with a response to reviewer comments.
Stage 5: Final Acceptance
After successful revisions and final evaluation by the editorial team, the manuscript is formally accepted for publication.
Stage 6: Production and Publication Process
Once a manuscript is accepted, it enters the production phase.
Copyediting – The manuscript undergoes editorial editing to improve clarity, grammar, and formatting while preserving the author’s academic content.
Typesetting – The article is formatted in accordance with the journal’s publication style.
Proofreading – Authors are provided with final proofs to review before publication.
Online Publication – The article is published in the upcoming issue and made available on the website.
Publication Timeline
Social Sustainability aims to maintain an efficient publication schedule.
Typical Timeline:
Initial editorial screening: 1–2 weeks
Peer review process: 3–6 weeks
Revision period for authors: 2–4 weeks
Final editorial decision: 1–2 weeks
Production and publication: 2–3 weeks
Total average processing time: 8–12 weeks
